The way we (as an industry) implement GDPR consent is a mess. I'm not sure why anyone would choose anything other than 'Use necessary cookies only', however I really can't tell the difference between either option and the trade-off of either choice, not to mention I can verify that it is only using necessary cookies only. Read More

History will judge us all on this mess, and I hope it will be a case study for all on the effects of nationalism, self-interests, colonial-hubris, celebrity-bafoonery.

Fuckers.

I've frequently said that for web apps to compete effectively in the world of apps, they need to be integrated in to all of the places that users expect apps to be. Inter-app communication is one of the major missing pieces of the web platform, and specifically one of the last major missing features is native level sharing: Web apps need to be able to get data out of their silo and into other web sites and apps; they also need to be able to receive the data from other native apps and sites. Read More

This is testing sharing directly from the camera app. It looks like it worked :) Read More

This is a test of the Share Target API on Android and it's ability to share files. If you see something here, then all is good :) Read More

Ricky Mondello over on the Safari team just recently shared a note about how Twitter is using the ./well-known/change-password spec.

I just noticed that Twitter has adopted the Well-Known URL for Changing Passwords! Is anyone aware of other sites that have adopted it?

Twitter's implementation: https://twitter.com/.well-known/change-password Github's: https://github.com/.well-known/change-password Specification :https://github.com/WICG/change-password-url

Read full post.

The feature completely passed me by but it is a neat idea: given a file in a well-known location, can the browser offer a UI to the user that allows them to quickly reset their password without having to navigate the sites complex UI..

The spec is deceptively simple: the well-known file simply contains the URL to direct the user to when they want to perform the action. This lead me in to thinking, can we offer more of these features:

• A well known location for GDPR-based consent models (cookie consent) - site owners could offer a link to the page where a user can manage and potentially revoke all cookies and other data consent items.
• A well known location for browser permission management - site owners could offer a quick place for users to be able to revoke permissions to things like geo-location, notifications and other primitives.
• A well known path for account deletion and changes
• A well known path for mailing list subscription management

The list goes on.... I really like the idea for simple redirect files to help users to discover common user actions, and for a way for the browser to surface it up.

Update: I added an issue to Chrome to see if we can get a similar implementation.

Jake and the team built this rather awesome custom element for managing pinch zooming on any set of HTML outside of the browser's own pinch-zoom dynamics (think mobile viewport zooming). The element was one of the central components that we needed for the squoosh app that we built and released at Chrome Dev Summit (... I say 'released at Chrome Dev Summit' - Jake was showing it to everyone at the China Google Developer Day even though the rest of the team were under embargo ;) ... )

install: npm install --save-dev pinch-zoom-element

<pinch-zoom>
  <h1>Hello!</h1>
</pinch-zoom>

Read full post.

I just added it to my blog (took just a couple of minutes), you can check it out on my 'life' section where I share photos that I have taken. If you are on a touch-enabled device you can quickly pinch-zoom on the element, if you are using a track-pad that can handle multiple finger inputs that works too.

This element is a great example of why I love web components as a model for creating user-interface components. The pinch-zoom element is just under 3kb on the wire (uncompressed) and minimal dependencies for building and it just does one job exceptionally well, without tying any custom application-level logic that would make it hard to use (I have some thoughts on UI logic vs App logic components that I will share based on my learning's from the Squoosh app).

I would love to see elements like these get more awareness and usage, for example I could imagine that this element could replace or standardise the image zoom functionality that you see on many commerce sites and forever take away that pain from developers.

Pete LePage introduces the Web Share Target API and the the availability in Chrome via an origin trial

Until now, only native apps could register as a share target. The Web Share Target API allows installed web apps to register with the underlying OS as a share target to receive shared content from either the Web Share API or system events, like the OS-level share button.

Read full post.

This API is a game changer on the web, it opens the web up to something that was only once available to native apps: Native Sharing. Apps are silos, they suck in all data and make it hard to be accessible across platforms. Share Target starts to level the playing field so that the web can play in the same game.

The Twitter Mobile experience has Share Target already enabled. This post was created using the Share Target I have defined in my sites 'admin panel' manifest.json - it works pretty well, and the minute they land file support I will be able to post any image or blob on my device to my blog.

Very exciting times.

Read the linked post to learn more about the time-lines for when this API should go live and how to use the API.

A great article and video and sample by Thomas Steiner on good push notifications on the web.

A particularly bad practice is to pop up the permission dialog on page load, without any context at all. Several high traffic sites have been caught doing this. To subscribe people to push notifications, you use the the PushManager interface. Now to be fair, this does not allow the developer to specify the context or the to-be-expected frequency of notifications. So where does this leave us?

Read full post.

Web Push is an amazingly powerful API, but it's easy to abuse and annoy your users. The bad thing for your site is that if a user blocks notifications because you prompt without warning, then you don't get the chance to ask again.

Treat your users with respect, Context is king for Web Push notifications.

Kayce Basques, an awesome tech writer on our team wrote up a pretty amazing article about his experiences measuring how well existing documentation best-practices work for explaining technical material. Best practices in this sense can be well-known industry standards for technical writing, or it could be your own companies writing style guide. Check it out!

Recently I discovered that a supposed documentation "best practice" may not actually stand up to scrutiny when measured in the wild. I'm now on a mission to get a "was this page helpful?" feedback widget on every documentation page on the web. It's not the end-all be-all solution, but it's a start towards a more rigorous understanding of what actually makes our docs more helpful.

Read full post.

Whilst I am not a tech writer, my role involves a huge amount of engagement with our tech writing team as well as also publishing a lot of 'best practices' for developers myself. I was amazed by how much depth and research Kayce has done on the art of writing modern docs through the lens of our teams content. I fully encourage you to read Kayce's article in-depth - I learnt a lot. Thank you Kayce!

Jason did an amazing talk about a little-known but new area of the web platform 'Feature Policy'.

Feature Policy is a new primitive which allows developers to selectively enable, disable, and modify the behaviour of certain APIs and features in the browser. It's like CSP, but for features & APIs! Teams can use new tools like Feature Policy and the Reporting API to catch errors before they grow out of control, ensure site performance stays high, keep code quality healthy, and help avoid the web's biggest footguns.

Check out featurepolicy.rocks for more information about Feature Policy, code samples, and live demos.

Submit new ideas for policies or feedback on existing policies at → https://bit.ly/2B3gDEU.

To learn more about the Reporting API see https://bit.ly/rep-api.

Read full post.

Feature policy is an interesting area that can seem like a hard place to work out where.

There are a couple of areas where I seeing it being beneficial:

1. Control 3rd-party content. As an embedder, you should be able to control what functionality runs in the context of your page and when it runs. Feature policy gives you that control. Don't want iframes to autoplay video? Turn it off. Don't want third party iframes to request geo-location? Turn it off. Don't want iframes to access sensor information? Turn it off. You should be in control of your experience, not third party sites.
2. Stay on target in development. We talked a lot at Chrome DevSummit about perf-budgets, yet today they can be hard to reason with. Feature Policy enabled on your development and staging services will help you know if any sets of changes you are making will breach your performance budgets by stopping you from doing the wrong thing. A case in point, our very own Chrome Dev Summit side had feature policy enabled for images called 'max-downscaling-image' - it inverts the colour of the image when it has been downscaled too much (a large image displayed in a small container). Feature policy picked it up and enabled us to make a decision about what to do. In the end, we disabled the policy because we were using the larger version of the image in multiple places and the images were already cached at that point.

I do encourage you all to look in to feature policy a lot more because it will play an important part of the future of the web. If you want to see the latest Policies that Chrome is implementing then checkout Feature Policy on Chrome Status

Some awesome photos from this years Chrome Dev Summit

I love this event ;)

Read full post.

I am like Wally - if you can find me, you get a sticker.

I am so excited! Tomorrow is the 6th Chrome Dev Summit and it's all coming together.

Join us at the 6th Chrome Dev Summit to engage with Chrome engineers and leading web developers for a two-day exploration of modern web experiences.

We'll be diving deep into what it means to build a fast, high quality web experience using modern web technologies and best practices, as well as looking at the new and exciting capabilities coming to the web platform.

Read full post.

I'm currently in the rehearsals and the tech check on the day before the event and it's looking pretty good :) the talks are done, the MC's are MC'ing, and the jokes are terrible :)

We've split the event into two distinct groups: Web of Today (Day 1); and thoughts on the Web of Tomorrow (Day 2).

The thinking I had behind this was that we want web developers to come away with a clear understanding of the what we (Chrome and Google) think is a good snapshot of modern web development and what we think the most important focuses businesses and developers should focus on for their users - Speed, UI, and Capability; and most importantly how to meet those objectives based on our learnings from working with a lot of developers over the last year.

The second day focus is interesting and it's something new that we are trying this year. The intent of the day is to be a lot clearer about what we are starting to work on over the year ahead and where we need your feedback and help to make sure that we are building things that developers need - there should be a lot of deep dives in to new technologies that are being designed to fix common problems we all have building modern web experiences and a lot of opportunity to give our teams feedback so that we can help build a better web with the ecosystem.

I'm really looking forward to seeing everyone over the next two days.

Simple steps to create an instagram-like Video Boomerang effect on the web Read More

Finding code that was changed in a commit Read More

I was in China a couple of weeks ago for the Google Developer Day and I was showing everyone my QRCode scanner, it was working great until I went offline. When the user was offline (or partially connected) the camera wouldn't start, which meant that you couldn't snap QR codes. It took me an age to work out what was happening, and it turns out I was mistakenly starting the camera in my onload event and the Google Analytics request would hang and not resolve in a timely manner. It was this commit that fixed it.

Because these types of assets block rendering, the browser will not paint anything to the screen until they have been downloaded (and executed/parsed). If the service that provides the file is offline, then that’s a lot of time that the browser has to spend trying to access the file, and during that period the user is left potentially looking at a blank screen. After a certain period has elapsed, the browser will eventually timeout and display the page without the asset(s) in question. How long is that certain period of time?

It’s 1 minute and 20 seconds.

If you have any render-blocking, critical, third party assets hosted on an external domain, you run the risk of showing users a blank page for 1.3 minutes.

Below, you’ll see the DOMContentLoaded and Load events on a site that has a render-blocking script hosted elsewhere. The browser was completely held up for 78 seconds, showing nothing at all until it ended up timing out.

Read full post.

I encourage you to read the post because there is a lot of great insight.

At the weekend I was playing around with a Boomerang effect video encoder, you can kinda get it working in near real-time (I'll explain later). I got it working on Chrome on Desktop, but it would never work properly on Chrome on Android. See the code here.

It looks like when you use captureStream() on a <canvas> that has a relatively large resolution (1280x720 in my case) the MediaRecorder API won't be able to encode the videos and it won't error and you can't detect that it can't encode the video ahead of time.

(1) Capture a large res video (from getUM 1280x720) to a buffer for later processing. (2) Create a MediaRecorder with a stream from a canvas element (via captureStream) sized to 1280x720 (3) For each frame captured putImageData on the canvas (4) For each frame call canvasTrack.requestFrame() at 60fps

context.putImageData(frame, 0, 0); canvasStreamTrack.requestFrame();

Demo: https://boomerang-video-chrome-on-android-bug.glitch.me/ Code: https://glitch.com/edit/#!/boomerang-video-chrome-on-android-bug?path=script.js:21:42

What is the expected result?

For the exact demo, I buffer the frames and then reverse them so you would see the video play forwards and backwards (it works on desktop). In generall I would expect all frames sent to the canvas to be processed by the MediaRecorder API - yet they are not.

What happens instead?

It only captures the stream from the canvas for a partial part of the video and then stops. It's not predicatable where it will stop.

I suspect there is a limit with the MediaRecorder API and what resolution it can encode depending on the device, and there is no way to know about these limits ahead of time.

As far as I can tell this has never worked on Android. If you use https://boomerang-video-chrome-on-android-bug.glitch.me which has a 640x480 video frame it records just fine. The demo works at higher-resolution just fine on desktop.

Read full post.

If you want to play around with the demo that works on both then click here

A nice post about PWA from Mike Elgan. I am not sure about Microsoft's goal with PWA, but I think our's is pretty simple: we want users to have access to content and functionality instantly and in a way they expect to be able to interact with it on their devices. The web should reach everyone across every connected device and a user should be able to access in their preferred modality, as an app if that's how they expect it (mobile, maybe), or voice on an assistant etc.

We're still a long way from the headless web, however, one thing really struck me in the article:

Another downside is that PWAs are highly isolated. So it’s hard and unlikely for different PWAs to share resources or data directly.

Read full post.

Sites and apps on the web are not supposed to be isolated, the web is linkable, indexable, ephemeral, but we are getting more siloed with each site we build. We are creating unintended silos because the platform doesn't easily allow users to get their data in and out off sites easily. I'm not talking about RDF or anything like that, basic operations such as copy and paste, drag and drop, share to site and share from site are broken on the web of today, and that's before we get to IPC between frames, workers and windows.

You should be able to create and edit videos using just the web in the browser. It should be possible to provide a user-interface akin to Screenflow that lets you create an output video that combines multiple videos, images, and audio into one video that can be uploaded to services like YouTube. Following on from the my previous post that briefly describes the requirements of the video editor, in this post I just wanted to quickly show in a screencast how I built the web cam recorder, and also how how to build a screencast recorder :) Read More

The first issue I have found trying to build a video editor on the web.

I have multiple video streams (desktop and web cam) and I wanted to be able to toggle between the video streams on one video element so that I can quickly switch between the web cam and the desktop and not break the MediaRecorder.

It looks like you should be able to do it via toggling the selected property on the videoTracks object on the <video> element, but you can't, the array of tracks contains only 1 element (the first video track on the MediaStream).

What steps will reproduce the problem? (1) Get two MediaStreams with video tracks (2) Add them to a new MediaStream and attach as srcObject on a videoElement (3) Check the videoElement.videoTracks object and see there is only one track

Demo at https://multiple-tracks-bug.glitch.me/

What is the expected result? I would expect videoElement.videoTracks to have two elements.

What happens instead? It only has the first videoTrack that was added to the MediaStream.

Read full post.

Repro case.

window.onload = () => {
  if('getDisplayMedia' in navigator) warning.style.display = 'none';

  let blobs;
  let blob;
  let rec;
  let stream;
  let webcamStream;
  let desktopStream;

  captureBtn.onclick = async () => {

       
    desktopStream = await navigator.getDisplayMedia({video:true});
    webcamStream = await navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia({video: { height: 1080, width: 1920 }, audio: true});
    
    // Always 
    let tracks = [...desktopStream.getTracks(), ... webcamStream.getTracks()]
    console.log('Tracks to add to stream', tracks);
    stream = new MediaStream(tracks);
    
    console.log('Tracks on stream', stream.getTracks());
    
    videoElement.srcObject = stream;
    
    console.log('Tracks on video element that has stream', videoElement.videoTracks)
    
    // I would expect the length to be 2 and not 1
  };

};