Hello.

Does the 100 in the User Agent break anything?

MDN created Browser Compat Data and it's a goldmine. We should be using it a lot more

I'm in the lucky position that our team is very productive and we've built a lot of amazing tools on NPM that developers for the most part love to use. The manager in me likes to quickly get a picture of how the web is doing, and how the work that our team does is going, so I end up building a lot of dashboards. One area that was a frustration was that I would have to go through each of our teams NPM modules by hand and see how they are doing.

How do we get your feedback in to the Chrome Web Platform team?

I wanted the functionality of Squoosh, but in my web app. Here's how I did it.

It should be easier to put an image on the page.

I want to share my thinking with you, and to refine my thoughts with feedback from developers.

After the Chrome Dev Summit, I had the chance to take some time off and spend it with my family, and during the downtime I got to think about all that has happened over the last year. I'm incredibly proud of my team and how they responded to the crisis that hit the world this year - we built tools like web.dev/covid to give developers advice on how to keep sites up and running, set up a forum for public services support during the lock-downs; ran web.

The web is a powerful thing, with the right capabilities you can create tools and services that can be deployed without a central authority and can also deeply integrate with the peoples devices. I love being able to tinker and scratch an itch quickly. The itch in question was that I'm a heavy user of .new domains and I wanted a quick way to have access to them on my Android home screen so that I can start a task without having to find the app, go through its menus and then create the "new" thing.

My daughter is attending nursery school and every day they post photos of the baby to a special portal so we can see what she has been doing. The web site, is, err, well... functional. However they block the ability to download the photos in their UI, I've no clue why, but it's super frustrating. I love Bookmarklet because they let me quickly augment a site without having to build a full extension, and this is no exception.

Just after my daughter was born we needed a simple way to track "Baby Habits" (Read: Eat, Poop, Wee, Sleep, and maybe a bit of Vom). During my baby duties when the baby was asleep I built Akachan.app to help us keep on top of things. I wanted this app to load instantly, and given that JavaScript is one of the biggest contributors to a slow page load, I gave myself the challenge to build Akachan as a SPA without client-side JS (more in another post), which for the most part I was able to do this with traditional POST's and a hefty amount of Service Worker logic.

I run a static site, it's built with Hugo and hosted on the edge with Vercel. Sometimes, I just want to include a small piece of server-side logic (Copyright notice anyone?) without having to spin up a complex node server or api endpoints. Sometimes I want to be able to drop a small piece of dynamic content in one single page on my static site. That's what I loved about Apache mod_include.

I've been learning a bit of Japanese for a little while now and whilst I find it very hard, I was quite happy to have read this book to my daughter today though!

I'm currently building a simple web app and I needed a simple templating engine that can stream dynamically generated responses to the network. It's hard to build sites that are fast. One known pattern for building sites that render quickly is to ensure that the browser gets the HTML as quickly as possible. Yet, many of the tools (middleware and templating engines) that developers use to build sites wait for the response from the server application to be completely created before they are put on to the wire and send to the client.

I'm currently building a simple CRUD client-side only data logger PWA that contains no client-side JavaScript apart from what is inside the service worker. To do that I am following basic REST principles, and just using the Form element to submit data to the service-worker that then stores in it IndexedDB and renders the results back out to the client. I will explain more in another post, but in this post I want to quickly document how I fixed an issue in Safari.

Idly browsing the web whilst I'm on paternity leave and saw that I have a lot of open tabs. :D

I thought this was rather cool and I discovered it by accident, but it looks like Twitter implemented shortcuts. It's great to see web sites and web apps being able to do things that users expect installed applications to be able to do.

I love view-source, it's a nifty super power of the web that nearly all mobile browsers are trying to kill. Not exactly sure why. View-source is what got me into web development because I could see how other people structured their pages, and at the time I started web development it was pretty much the only way to debug web pages. I've also been using my iPad Pro whilst I am not at work for the next month or so.

Sometimes when I am on my mobile, I just want quick access to the JS console so that I can see what is going on inside the web page: Does the page have any logs, warnings or errors etc; without having to plug my phone into a laptop and hooking up to Chrome DevTools. I really wish you could use DevTools more easily on a mobile device. That being said, I have a partial solution that solves my problem.