I explored using LLMs for checking web API browser compatibility. Existing LLMs struggle with outdated data, so I experimented with MDN's Browser Compat Data (BCD). Initial trials using raw BCD JSON with GPT-4 had limitations. To improve this, I converted the BCD into English descriptions of API support and loaded it into a Polymath instance. This allows natural language queries about API compatibility across browsers, like "Is CSS Grid supported in Safari, Firefox, and Chrome?" or "When was CSS acos available in Chrome?". The results are promising, but further refinement is needed to ensure accuracy and reliability.
This post discusses the challenges web developers face due to the constantly evolving web platform. It highlights the difficulty in keeping up with changes, browser inconsistencies, and the lack of clear documentation. It then outlines the efforts made to address these issues, focusing on improving communication about the web platform, enhancing compatibility and interoperability across browsers (Compat 2021, Interop 2022), and investing in better documentation like MDN's Browser Compat Data. These initiatives aim to create a more stable and predictable web development experience, fostering innovation.
We've been using surveys like the MDN Developer Needs Survey and our own quarterly surveys to understand web developer challenges and prioritize our efforts. These surveys highlighted issues like web compatibility, testing, and documentation, leading to improvements like our Web Compat initiative and increased focus on MDN documentation. While valuable, these surveys don't offer granular feedback on specific projects or proposals. Direct feedback is essential, but our current approach is informal and inconsistent. To address this, we've partnered with C SPACE to create the Web Developer Insights Community – a dedicated group of ~1000 web developers who'll provide direct feedback to our questions. This community allows open communication among developers while limiting Chrome team influence. We're excited about this new channel for gathering actionable developer insights and encourage you to join if you're interested.
The MDN Browser Compatibility Report 2020 surveyed web developers to identify pain points in cross-browser compatibility. Layout and styling issues, especially with Flexbox and Grid, topped the list, along with challenges related to viewport units, scrolling on mobile, and achieving consistent form styling. Internet Explorer and Safari were frequently cited as problematic browsers. While JavaScript was initially flagged as a concern, interviews revealed that transpilers like Babel largely mitigate core language issues, shifting the focus to browser APIs and their inconsistencies. The report highlighted ongoing efforts to improve compatibility, including fixes for Flexbox and Grid in Chromium and WebKit, the transition to Chromium-based Edge, and a commitment to enhancing MDN's browser compatibility data.
This post discusses the importance of developer satisfaction, particularly for web developers, and how the MDN Web Developer Needs Assessment has influenced Chrome's web platform priorities for 2020. My hypothesis is that improving the web platform will lead to increased developer satisfaction, more content creation, and happier end-users. Based on the MDN survey data, key areas for improvement include browser compatibility, testing, documentation, debugging, framework integration, and privacy & security. Chrome is committed to working with the web ecosystem to address these challenges and increase developer productivity and satisfaction. We'll share more specific plans in the coming weeks and welcome your feedback on these focus areas and how Chrome can better engage with the developer community.
